So, for several years I have been thinking about the viability of an online Christian community and Christian resource. The thought first came to me while in Seminary.

It seems that the professor that I was in conversation about the project has since launched his own online religious community with a membership rate of $100 a year. With your membership in that organization you get 2 weekly devotional blog entries and the occasional article on a Christian “practice.” The weekly devotional bits are about 500 words a piece so, as a member you are paying $100 for a little more than 52,000 words and about 10,000 additional words in these occasional articles. Members are also able to pay a slightly discounted rate for quarterly online workshops.

I am still interested in launching this sort of blog/community, but I would like some input from my friends and readers. My hope would be to write a devotion Wednesday, Friday, and a longer sermon like text on Sunday, this could be expanded as readership increases. Then have regular features posted Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Lastly, I would hope to release a “Bible” or other sort of group/individual study either every other month or quarterly. I do have additional plans for growth as readership increases and the income from the site would allow me to transition from Full-time Residential Skills Trainer to Full-time religious blogger/community moderator etc. Future thoughts include online seminars, books with members paying cost of print, podcasts/livestream “shows” and additional authors and content.

My question then is would you support/join such a site and would you be willing to pay somewhere between $25-$50 a year?

What additional information would you like to have?

I am pretty horrible at this whole blogging thing. I knew it was the case, but recently it was brought to my attention again. I will make no promises, but I am really going to try to write more often in this thing and maybe even include more personal information, not only the opinion things that have made up the majority of my blogging.

For those of you who don’t know, I work overnights. Out of an eight hour shift, I probably have about 4 hours of work to do (that might even be on the high side). I do some cleaning, cooking, hourly bed checks, documenting on residents, and finally I do a lot of wake-up prompting of residents.

So, what do I do with the other four hours? I try to find a lot of other random work to fill the other four hours, I might do some writing, and I do a lot of thinking. Throughout the entire shift I listen to podcasts and audiobooks.

The thinking thing though is what I want to talk about. I have been having a great deal of thoughts about Biblical interpretation and also theology. Who would have guessed that the person who dedicated 6 years of education to religion would find their “resting” mind playing games with theology?

One thing that I keep coming back to are alternative readings and understandings of Biblical texts. When I am reading and contemplating the text, I try to ignore everything I have been told about the text. I try to forget the sermons and classes that I have had on the topic and just read the words, in English or Greek.

One thing that I am starting to realize is that regardless of the flavor of Christian you are, most of what you believe the Bible is telling you, isn’t really there, or isn’t the most reasonable way of thinking about the text. If we focused more on what the Bible is actually saying and less on what other people have said about the Bible, Christianity would have a very different shape.

That leads me to a question that I have been struggling with. Which is more important: the Bible’s message, or the Church’s message about the Bible? What is odd is that the groups that are more likely to say that the BIBLE is the most important are most likely to find their understanding of the Bible most tainted by the traditions surrounding the text and not the message of the Bible itself.

Last night while I was driving to work, I happened across a conservative Christian radio show. How do I know that it is a conservative Christian radio show? Well, the presenter, said “Now is the time for the People of God to rise up and take the government back from the powers of Satan.” Of course, when he later equated the powers of Satan with the ideology of the Democratic Party.

Anyhow, none of this is really the point. He ended his program by discussing a letter he recently received from some “friends.” These friends are disappointed and disillusioned. The presenter blamed this disillusionment on 24 hour new programming, somehow, news is the enemy because it allows people to have greater access to the wider world. Too much information is depressing because it inundates the viewer with too many events, mainly negative.

His response to these friends was that he has “some certainty that God might still be on [God’s] throne, and when God is in power, some good can still happen. While God is on his throne the People of God are sometimes kind, sometimes compassionate, and can sometimes still do good.”

What does it mean to be the “People of God?” My understanding of being Christian involves action, doing, being God, Christ to the world. We have a particular vocation to manifest the love of Christ for a world that sorely needs to be reminded of God’s love. Yet, if I take this radio host’s statement at face value, the best that the People of God can do is be a part-time People of God.

I admit that as humans, we often fail to do the will of God, but the fact that we fails doesn’t mean that we should settle for second best. We shouldn’t just “sometimes” try to do the will of God, we shouldn’t strive to only “sometimes” be the People of God. Being a People of God, being Christian is our primary task, it is our full-time vocation.

The weather lately seems to be conspiring against me working in the garden. The weeds have gotten out of hand. The rain and the out of season heat has made working in the garden just plain difficult and uncomfortable. This afternoon I was able to go out and do some weeding. I got about half way through the garden rows. Tomorrow morning I will be heading back out with my goal being to finish the weeding of the rows and hopefully do the more close to the plant hand weeding.

When I look around the garden I am sort of frustrate to see that we are really the only ones experiencing the difficulty with the weeds, be they grasses, or the former inhabitant of the plot, alfalfa. It isn’t that the other gardeners have been out weeding more or are braving the miserable weather, but instead they are using herbicides. K. and I have made a decision to try to be as organic as is possible. The added work should mean we have a healthier garden, but I am thinking that I need a much better way of weed prevention. I am thinking of finding somewhere that has a lot of newspapers for recycling and laying down a layer of paper in the rows, that should save some time and also add a bit of matter into the garden.

In some more exciting news today I harvested our first fruits (by that I mean veg). We planted some radishes some weeks back and they are already available for harvest. They are beautiful things. We went with “French” radishes, so they are long and cylindrical rather than spherical. I had to try one of course and was surprised by the strength of the flavor. I am used to a bit of a peppery bite, but this was incredible. The pepper flavor was so strong that it almost brought me to tears. It seems odd, but I think that in the next few weeks, I will be substituting radishes for pepper.

I remain a member of a congregation that is vehemently opposed to the idea that a homosexual in a same gender couple could be called to be a pastor. I can understand their position, but I disagree. My wife and I stopped attending this congregation nearly two years ago when members of the congregation made it abundantly clear that we were no longer welcomed, because we support the denomination (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America) of which they are a member.

Last November this congregation held a “first” of two votes to leave the ELCA, the vote failed, but the margin was quite small. By mid-December a small body had formed and signed a petition to hold a second first vote. That vote occurred in early February, and the motion passed to leave the ELCA with around 80% voting in favor of abandoning the ELCA.

This Sunday (May 15th) is scheduled to be the second vote to leave. If it passes the congregation ceases to be a part of the ELCA and will become a congregation in the newly formed North America Lutheran Church, a body that formed in protest against the 2009 church wide decision to ordain homosexuals in committed same gender relationships.

I am fairly certain that the congregation will choose to leave the ELCA. My wife and I still hear members attack the ELCA and the idea that “God could love gays.” However in the mail today with the announcement of the vote there was also a letter from several members of the congregation that support the ELCA. They are calling for the congregation to remain part of the ELCA because they do not want to see the congregation divided. I was excited and proud to see my supervisor and a member of my organization’s cabinet as signing members to this letter.

For me the fate of the congregation has become a foregone conclusion, but I wonder what these members, and others like them, might do when/if the congregation votes to leave the ELCA. Will they remain in the congregation and follow it into the NALC, or do they plan on leaving the congregation for another, or a new congregation?

I think that I will approach them, probably in a letter since I work nights and ask them their plans and if they are wanting to create a new mission church as part of the ELCA I will offer to help them create services and curriculum.

I hope that this Sunday brings a vote to stay in the ELCA, but if it does there will continue to be “first” votes until the congregation is wore out.

I was tricked by the American dream. The people in my life during the junior and senior year of high school all lied to me. They told me, just follow your dream, study what you are passionate about, and you will get a great job. Through out college that same message was propagated by advisers, deans, and department heads. So, after completing four years of school, being the “outstanding student in Theology,” I went on to seminary. I was pursuing an odd degree, a more academic degree, but was constantly told, “you could be a teacher, professor, director of faith formation, or at worst a youth minister.”

I graduated and within days the government announced that the nation, and the world were entering a recession. The first jobs to be cut that I had been trained for, the directors of faith formation and Christian education. I really wasn’t qualified to teach, unless I received more education, so I began looking for work as a youth minister.

Turns out that when everyone is losing their jobs, every out of work, overweight Christian male becomes a “youth minister.” I sent out hundreds of applications and resumes. I had a few interviews. It turns out that when the economy is tanking, so is congregation giving, so my education turned out to be my liability. Since I was actually educated I commanded a higher price. A price most congregations just could not afford. I was lucky to even be noticed, one congregation that interviewed me had 1200 applicants, 4 times their weekly attendance.

So, I found out that following my passion, discovering the color of my parachute, has only led to a highly educated human. Really that is all that my education did, it thought me how to be human. It left me with little career options and few skills to convert into vocational advantages. It thought me to think independently and to write, and well quite a bit of useless information about religion, particularly the history of Christian thought.

In thinking about what these skills prepare me to do several options have come to mind.

  1. I could write a blog about being human, maybe teach some other people about this valuable skill.
  2. I could create an online community of like-minded Christians longing for community and additional support on their faith quest.
  3. I could start some wacko cult, steal the brainwashed mass’s money while preparing them for JEEEEE-SUS with a cocktail of kool-aid and cyanide.

I have chosen to work on the second option,  but, beware, if the Church of the Holy Other starts knocking on your door, don’t drink the pink lemonade, it means that I’ve failed or given up on the community.

I know that I haven’t written here for quite awhile. I have been thinking about the format all the blogs I have will be taking in the future. I have made some decisions other blogs I am still just not all that certain about.

1) Religionweekly: For the people who really loved that blog, I am sorry, while I might occasionally post something there, it will also be posted here or some other accessible location. But, after making the ridiculous decision to have it tied to a work evaluation, I am tired of the blog, at least for the time being. You see my job requires us to make specific, measurable goals. I had as a goal to write one entry a week, minimum to religion weekly, and to find at least one contributor.  I succeeded with the goal, but the requirement to write led to my despising the site. I also had very unrealistic personal expectations. Maybe in several months or years I will again restart regular work on religionweekly.

2)Edward and Kymberly’s Blog: This wasanother blog that I had some hopes for. I had intended it as a way initially for Kym and I to get out some information for our guess leading up to our wedding (July 4th, 2009), but then after the wedding we had hoped to regularly post updates and photos. Turns out that if you have difficulty keeping track of one blog, adding another doesn’t make life any easier. Again, hopefully we can find time and topics to post on, but that just might have to wait for more significant changes in our work and personal lives.

3)Edward’s Blog: Yep, this one. I think more than anything, I grabbed the site name hoping to come up with something later. I have had personal blogs before, none of them ever lasted more than a few years. The reality is that I find my own life rather boring. If I find it boring, why would you ever want to read about it. Looking back through the entries, the majority are related to my opinions. Most of those surround the ELCA’s action of last August. I am not sure what will happen with this particular blog. I am sensing that it will remain a place for me to write my thoughts and opinion and maybe in time become the center of my online presence.

I have two other blogs, that I haven’t really made public in any way. One will remain rather private until I have built up enough content to make it worthwhile. The other was created and really killed in a week.

I have mixed emotions about blogging. I used to love it, but now, I am finding myself more hesitant to spend my time with any internet site. I am finding that while the internet is a convenience and more and more becoming an essential utility for modern life, it is also been the biggest distraction in my life. I am constantly finding myself amazed when I sit down to write an article, short story, or to do research and hours later discover that I have wasted all of the time.

Grace and Peace to you from the One Who is, Who was, and Who is to come,
Jesus Christ our Lord, Amen.

I continue to pray for you and for all of my brothers and sisters in Christ spread across the globe. In this I say that I pray for all humanity, because truly all people are the sons and daughters of God and thus the siblings of our dear older brother, Jesus. But, I pray particularly now for you, in the trials and tribulations that you are now facing.

I have heard of and have experienced the squabbling, fighting, and bitter division that is now facing you and other congregations like yours. What are we fighting over? Is it acceptable that a man or woman be called to be a pastor at a congregation who would have them, if that man or woman is in love with a member of the same gender. This is our fight, at least on the surface. In all reality we are arguing over many more difficult and deeper things, like the nature of scripture, the meaning of and ways we are a “church,” what is salvation, grace, and the nature of sin. So, this one letter can not answer all of your concerns. I hope though to make a start.

The first thing is that all involved in the disagreement need to do is stop, step back, and calm down. Yes, there have been many heated arguments. There have been insults and misunderstandings and many more things that we should regret and be ashamed of. Is this really the way that Christ would have us treat our neighbor, or more so, our brother and sister, if we have a disagreement? Matthew 5:23-24 tells us that if we come to the altar with a gift and remember that our brother or sister have a disagreement with us we should leave the gift and be reconciled to our brother or sister. Should we, in our current state of disagreement, presume to receive the gifts from the altar, the body and the blood, when we, according to the scripture, are not even capable of offering our gifts at the altar?

I am not one to normally consider withholding the sacraments from any individual. As a Lutheran, my ancestors left the Roman Catholic Church because they felt the sacraments were being held captive. And, yet, at this moment, when our anger and our resentment of other Christians are at their highest, I contemplate just such an action. Not as a punishment or as a means of lauding power over others, I have no power to deny anyone the sacraments, but because Communion as a sacrament reminds us of our unity with Christ and our neighbors, all humanity, all Christians. However at this moment, our bitterness and our disagreements have led to a breaking of the unity, a breaking of the communion, with each other. How can I take communion with Christ if I can not love my neighbor due to his or her belief regarding homosexuality? Until I can forgive those who disagree with me, and receive forgiveness from those who oppose me; until I can be reconciled to them and remember that they too are my brothers and sisters, the dearly loved children of God our Father, how can I claim communion with Christ?

Let us begin again. Let us forgive each other our wrongs, and swear to one another that we will approach our disagreements with more tact, restraint, and respect. Let us remember and reflect on how we have acted and who we have harmed every time we step up to the altar to receive the body and blood of our Lord. If we are able and if we find our hearts troubled with our actions or the actions of our neighbor, may God give us the strength to turn away and be reconciled to our brothers and sisters before we receive the gifts.

Grace and Peace to you.
Your Brother in Christ,
EWHP

I am typing this with one hand. At 2:20am Sunday, I burned my left hand. As you can imagine it is rather unpleasant. It is healing right along and only occasionally is there any pain.

I have had some interesting experiences the past couple days that I find horribly telling and amusing at the same time. you see, just by how I walk the burnt and bandaged hand is normally hidden from viewor people just flat out pay attention. They see me and ask the very scripted “How are you doing?” Then it happens they see my hand and this sudden look of horror washes over their face. I wonder why the look of horror, is it some form of sympathetic reaction or, as i think more likely, is it terror at the thought that they might have opened Pandora’s box and they are prepared for some minutes of self-piety? My respond is always “fine” and a look of confused relief washes over them.

Why do we ask “How are you?” when we really don’t care for an answer? why has our social script developed a greeting of concern and care when at its very core our society lacks both concern  and care?

Recently a childhood friend of mine said something that has really bothered me. I have been thinking about it for the past two weeks. She said, when talking to me about one of her friends, “You two wouldn’t get along. He’s not into theology, he’s into Jesus.” Like somehow because I have studied theology and would identify myself as a theologian, I do not like or believe in Jesus. It is a common problem I have found with conservative Christians, they think that because an individual does not speak of Christ in everything or do not espouse Republican ideology that somehow our faith is deficient. I’ve been told that liberals have a “shallow” faith.

When I first arrived at college, I had a fairly weak faith, in many ways it was identical to the conservative, evangelical imperial religion we see in the United States. I had many of the conservative characteristics both politically and religiously that they measure “faith” by, I hated the right people. In college though, everything changed.

I started reading the Bible, not just in the selfish, self-centered, and narrow-minded way that is essential for the continuation of the conservative evangelical. I had been taught that my devotions should only ask “what’s in it for me?” I started reading the Bible and asking more difficult questions like, for whom was this written? Why? Where? How did the first readers understand the text? What was their world like? How has the understanding of the text changed? What’s the importance of the changes? Then and only then could I really start to grasp at scripture. Looking at the history of the Bible forced me to start reading the Bible from other peoples’ perspectives. Before I had only seen the message and verses that I wanted to see. Now the Bible has begun asking me serious questions. I stopped assuming that the Bible speaks directly to me and stopped assuming that I knew what the Bible had to say. I started to hear its own answers, questions, and concerns. Themes began to arise.

I quickly discovered that the faith of my childhood had been severely insufficient. I slowly developed a more mystic personal faith and a liberal public faith. My personal faith is much more difficult to describe to others, but I can assure you that few of you would recognize it. Suffice it to say that I feel communion not just with the Divine or even with other Christians, but with all of God’s creation. I also question most if not all of our doctrinal statements (this includes the “nondenominational” statements of faith that are rife with doctrine). My public faith has taken on many aspects of liberal theology and liberal Christianity, because my reading of scripture points me to the fact that it is amongst the liberal theologians that we find the most authentic reading and understanding of scripture. My reading of scripture has led me to the conviction that people come before paper. Often times we allow our understanding of the Bible to get between ourselves and our compassion towards other people. Our reading of the Bible also gets between ourselves and Jesus. It is easy to spend time alone reading the Bible, but it is hard work to love people. It is easy to read the Bible’s condemnation of various people when they are not us. It is hard to step back and step into those same peoples’ lives and witness God’s love and work through their lives. We like pointing fingers so long as we aren’t on the receiving end.

As I studied the Bible I found several key themes that now shape my life and faith.

  1. Don’t Judge.

      I know it is hard, we have a book filled with condemnations and accusations. But we also have very frequent messages to suspend judgment because judgment is God’s job. We seek to correct our neighbor’s sins while refusing to see let alone correct our own sins. I am trying to withhold my judgment of others and instead to look at and correct my own sins and the sins of others that I contribute to, yet I am constantly struggling against the desire to correct others. We must remember that when we judge others we are judging ourselves.

  2. Love and compassion

      These two words are probably the biggest themes of the New Testament aside from the Kingdom of God (which arguably is a message of love and compassion). Love is the most powerful and dangerous of God’s gifts. Everything that we do should be out of our love for God, Jesus, and humanity. We discover that we are only capable of love and compassion because God has loved us.

  3. Believing is encouraged, actions are necessary.

      I am not saying that somehow our good deeds will save us, but it seems that without our works, our belief is incomplete. How do we know the tree is healthy? Jesus asks and the answer is simply by it’s fruit. Likewise God can only judge our faith and faithfulness by the fruit it produces in us and in the world.

      What is odd to me is that Jesus taught so very little about what a Christian ought to believe, but this is always the first thing we ask. “I heard such and such was an Anglo-Baptist with Lutheran leanings, What do they believe?” Yet, the think that Christ taught, what a Christian ought to do, we completely ignore. How often have you asked “So, what does your church do,” or “how do you live out your faith?”

What would happen if we brought the meaning of “Christian” back to Christ’s teachings? When someone asked, “What’s a Christian?” The answer would no longer be “a person who believes that Jesus was the Son of God who came to save believers from the effects of sin.” to “a person who loves their neighbor and enemy like them self and who cares for and serves the outcasts and marginalized of the world with compassion in following with the life and teachings of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, who they believe to be the Son of God, Savior of the World.”

More often than not I am finding that my faith in Jesus and my devotion to his teaching place me at odds with the institutionalized forms of the Church, comfortable Christians, and the Bible itself. I have come to accept this and also am comforted by the Bible’s message that the prophets and disciples were accused of similar things.

Do I go around door to door selling Jesus? Do I travel the highways and by-ways looking for overpasses to spray paint with “Jesus Saves?” Do I preface every “good” deed with a statement about how I do this or that for Christ? If these questions are what determine if I am into Jesus (just that phrase repulses me like somehow Jesus is a fad to be had today and dropped as the seasons change), then the answer must be a resounding “NO!”

But, if the question is “Do I hold Christ to be the exemplar and source of my life, the foundation and guide?” Then, yes, I am “into Jesus.”

My study of theology was to better understand Jesus and the teachings about him. Now, my love of theology come from recognizing the transformative power of good teachings of and about Jesus Christ can have. There really is an “orthodoxy” (a right teaching) and central to this orthodoxy is a call and command to an orthopraxis (a right practice). No teaching about Christ is complete unless it asks us to recenter our lives and actions around Christ and the Cross.

NaNoWriMo Badges

Calendar

January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Twitter feed

Copyright Info

Creative Commons License
Edward's Blog by Edward Pease is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://edwardwhpease.wordpress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.